Whatunmaintainedsoftwarecosts
It never invoices you directly. It shows up as the framework version nobody dares upgrade, the security patch applied a year late, the page that got slower every quarter until users started calling. Maintenance is cheaper than rescue — reliably, and by a wide margin.
Scheduled monitoring, patching, and tuning — issues caught early and fixed under written SLAs, not after users start calling.
- The framework version nobody dares upgrade
- The security patch applied a year late
- The page that got slower every quarter until users started calling
What a plan covers
Monitoring, patching, tuning, fixes, and SLAs — everything in one predictable monthly plan.
Monitoring & alerting
Uptime, performance, and error tracking with escalation before users notice
Security patching
Dependencies, frameworks, and infrastructure kept current on a schedule
Performance tuning
The slow-creep degradations found and fixed quarterly
Bug fixes & minor enhancements
A monthly capacity for the small improvements that keep users happy
Written SLAs
Response and resolution times in the contract, not in good intentions
Backup & disaster recovery
Automated backups, recovery testing, and failover planning that keep critical systems recoverable when the unexpected happens
Capacity planning & scalability
Proactive resource optimization and infrastructure planning to handle growth without compromising performance or availability
Wemaintainsoftwarewedidn'tbuild
Inherited a system from a vendor who vanished? We start with a code and infrastructure audit, document what exists, stabilize what's fragile, and take ownership from there. It's some of the most valuable work we do — and the most common way new clients find us.
Proof
Roughly half our maintenance clients arrive with someone else's codebase. The audit-first approach means we never take responsibility for what we haven't mapped — then we stabilize, patch, and support under written SLAs.
Discuss your project50%
Inherited codebases
95%
Client retention
24/7
Coverage available
Commonquestions,straightanswers
No — roughly half our maintenance clients arrive with someone else's codebase. The audit-first approach means we never take responsibility for what we haven't mapped.